Ufs 22 Vs Emmc 51 Link

Transferring a 2GB movie via USB to an eMMC device is a test of patience. UFS 2.2 cuts that time by nearly 60%. Similarly, installing a large system update or unzipping a file is drastically faster.

Modern games take up huge amounts of space. Loading a level in Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile is much faster on UFS. Furthermore, because UFS allows for simultaneous read/write, background updates won't tank your frame rate as much as they would on eMMC. ufs 22 vs emmc 51 link

As apps grow larger and more complex, eMMC 5.1 can start to feel sluggish within months, whereas UFS 2.2 is designed to handle the data demands of modern operating systems. If your budget allows, always opt for Transferring a 2GB movie via USB to an

| Test | eMMC 5.1 (Real-world) | UFS 2.2 (Real-world) | Performance Gap | | :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | 280 MB/s | 950 MB/s | 3.4x faster | | Sequential Write | 180 MB/s | 480 MB/s | 2.6x faster | | Random Read (4KB) | 15 MB/s | 145 MB/s | 9.6x faster | | Random Write (4KB) | 12 MB/s | 110 MB/s | 9.1x faster | Modern games take up huge amounts of space